Signs, Sacraments, & Anamnesis: Excerpt from 2020 Inklings Lecture

by Fr. Gabriel Rochelle


Feast of St Hilarion the Great

Anno Domini 2020, October 21




Nearing his seventieth birthday, David Jones was interviewed in his one-room flat in London by Saunders Lewis, his old friend and leader of the movement for Welsh nationalism and language. Jones’s painful shyness and difficulty with expressing himself orally is noticeable in this BBC program, but the very end is significant. Lewis says to Jones, “Here in this room you are surrounded by all the reminders of the context of your life…and with these paint pots and brushes and everything you keep your contact with the earlier painter.” Jones replies, “Yes, with the whole world of sacraments and signs” (full interview available online here). Sacraments and signs are his natural homeland as an Anglo-Welsh man and as Catholic Christian.


The epigraph that Jones chose for his book In Parenthesis is a quote from the Catholic writer Maurice de la Taille: “He placed himself in the order of signs” (Epoch and Artist, title page and p. 179). Christ entered the human condition, where sign and sacrament are possible as a surplus of meaning. The flowers given to one’s lover are not merely material flowers; they bear the significance of love. They are a sign. By entering the human condition, Christ placed Himself in the order of signs. Sign is foundation of sacrament: this bread and wine bear a surplus; they are at once the body and blood of Christ. To recall Augustine, the sacrament is a “visible sign of invisible grace.” As Jones writes, “A sign must be significant of something, hence of some ‘reality,’ so of something ‘good,’ so of something that is ‘sacred’” (ibid., p. 157).


Jones connects this sign-making of Christ with the concept of anamnesis that is central to the working agenda of The Anathémata, the whole of which emerged from contemplation on the anaphora of the eucharist. Jones had read Dom Gregory Dix’s Shape of the Liturgy, and he was deeply impressed with the idea that the whole life and ministry, passion and sacrifice of Christ are given to the faithful so that they may be present with these realities of the faith, transcending time and space in Eucharist. Indeed, he quotes Dix as follows: “…in the scriptures of both the Old and New Testament anamnesis and the cognate verb have a sense of ‘recalling’ or ‘re-presenting’ before God an event in the past so that it become here and now operative by its effects” (“Mabinog’s Liturgy,” pp. 182-221 in Anathémata, cited at footnote 1, p. 205; italics in the text; quote from Dix, Shape of the Liturgy, p. 161). Anamnesis is not only the heart of Jones’s theology and his concept of art; it informed the whole of his life. 


In his essay “The Arthurian Legend,” Jones makes it clear that his entire approach to art is grounded in anamnesis and sacrament (pp. 210f), which for him means that “this thing may be made other.” In his words, what was then must be made now; history must be relevant to the present, and in such a way it will inform the future. Jones called this view “transubstantiated actual-ness.” Tom Dilworth relates an epithet from Jones’s early childhood apposite this adult stance. David overheard his mother ask their doctor, a Yorkshire Quaker, why Friends had no sacraments. The doctor replied, “But surely Mrs. Jones, the whole of life is a sacrament.” As Dilworth remarks, Jones agreed with these words throughout his life (Thomas Dilworth, David Jones: Engraver, Soldier, Painter, Poet [Counterpoint Press: Berkeley, 2017], p. 10).


The “transubstantiated actual-ness” of history, myth, and legend informs all of Jones’s writings. This is especially true of the major works In Parenthesis, The Anathémata, and the latter’s literary predecessor The Sleeping Lord. It is, furthermore, the engine that drives his essay “The Myth of Arthur.” In practice this means that Jones used and mined and valorized the witness of the past as he understood it to inform his present thought and work. But this usage was not grounded in nostalgia; it was based on something other.


This brings us to the important idea, in Welsh consciousness, of hiraeth and cymreictod. […]


*Excerpt from 2020 Inklings Lecture on Oct 17, 2020. Become an Eighth Day Member and we’ll send you a video of the entire lecture, plus three more Inklings Lectures and a public toast to the Inklings. Plus you'll get access to the full digital library.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap June 9, 2026
In Memory of Warren Farha, 1955-2026
By Jeremy Wagner May 15, 2026
An Ode to St. Brendan the Voyager
More Posts