Fight, Flight or Freeze?

I RECENTLY presented a lecture titled “ Podvig : Notes towards the Definition of a Russian Option.” I prepared it as a response to Rod Dreher’s now world-famous Benedict Option (did you know his book has been translated into eleven languages!). Almost immediately after I finished delivering the lecture, I realized I had completely failed to actually answer the key question that had been posed to me: Fight or Flight?

I believe Eighth Day Institute’s annual Inklings Oktoberfest is an incarnation of part of the answer to that question. So I want to briefly reflect on the nature of that festival by offering you a first – and abbreviated – draft of what could be considered a second conclusion to that talk on podvig (you’ll have to wait for it’s publication to learn more about podvig …sorry!).

My good friend Dr. Mark Mosley sent me an interesting email when he discovered I was working on a lecture addressing the question of “Fight or Flight?” He reminded me that from both a physiological and a psychological perspective there is a third option (which happens to work nicely with the original alliteration): Fight, Flight, or Freeze?

If we find ourselves in danger and respond with either fight or flight, our heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate increase, as does our alertness and vigilance. However, if there is no chance for survival by fighting or fleeing and we respond by freezing, our nervous system reacts very differently: the heart rate slows down, it may cause us to fall over to preserve blood flow, or it may even simulate death so that a predator loses interest.

Dr. Mosley suggested that our culture might be better characterized as one that has “frozen” rather than one that is fighting or fleeing. According to Mosley, “The difference psychologically and culturally is that ‘fight or flight’ recognizes that the stimulus is a danger and responds with action. ‘Freeze,’ on the other hand, either cannot consciously recognize the ‘danger’ and respond with appropriate action or it avoids the danger by shutting all emotion and movement off as a way of controlling the fear response.”

I think Dr. Mosley is onto something. I think we are watching our western culture, which was forged by the early Church, writhe in its final death throes. And while there are still many who respond as “cultural warriors” and a few who actually flee to the mountains, I think many of us are simply frozen. We don’t know how to respond. We just don’t know what to do. This gives us an even stronger impetus to think carefully about the question of fight or flight and to adequately articulate an answer.

I believe the answer is both fight and flight. And if I was compelled to provide a pithy characterization of each response, I’d give you the following: Christians must respond to our secular age with an ascetic flight and a festive & intellectually coherent fight .

Flight is absolutely necessary. In many ways, with our media-saturated and noise-ridden world, flight is more necessary than ever. We must flee the ways of the world. And this flight must be an ascetic flight . The word asceticism comes from the Greek word askesis , which simply means exercise or training. In the early Church it came to signify spiritual training through practices such as solitude, silence, prayer, fasting, and confession. These ascetical practices help us overcome our passions, cleanse our perceptions, make us holy, restore our likeness to God. We must pray and fast.

In his novel The Devils , Dostoyevsky compares Russia with the Gadarene demoniac whom Christ alone could heal. I would suggest the same applies to the western world today. A legion of evil spirits has overtaken it and they are shaking it with convulsion, torturing and maiming it. The only hope for it to be set free is through a spiritual struggle, an ascetical exploit, a podvig , one that is invisible but of great proportions. We, the West, are possessed. And we desperately need an exorcism. Christ says this kind does not come out except by prayer and fasting (Matt. 17:21). This is our ascetic flight.

But I would also insist on the fight response. Our ascetic flight (our prayer and fasting) is actually part of the Church’s fight. But there is more to be done. I believe we must also offer a festive, intellectually coherent fight . I think the world is hungry for an intellectually coherent and thus persuasive account of our faith. As Peter once put it in his first epistle, we must always be ready to give an answer to everyone who asks us to give the reason for our hope (1 Pet. 3:15). This is why I’m such a passionate advocate for reading, for returning to the Fathers. Eighth Day Institute organizes events that challenge your mind, that encourage you to think about your faith, that return you to your roots, all so you can renew our culture through faith and learning.

But an intellectually coherent fight is not enough. Our fight must also be festive. The Church does not limit Herself to austere seasons of fasting; there are also jubilant seasons of feasting. There is a time for sorrow and there is a time for joy. There is a time for flight and there is a time for fight. There is a time for fasting and there is a time for feasting. I believe the Church has a huge opportunity to show the world the joy of our life in Christ through feasts properly celebrated. There are so many rich feasts in the Church’s tradition. Moreover, many of them are already a part of the regular cycle of our secular world’s calendar (e.g., Christmas, Easter, St. Valentine’s Day, St. Patrick’s Day). We just need to restore and display the deeply Christian and festive nature of their celebration.

And then there are the Inklings, a small group of friends who read and wrote together, who met at a pub regularly over pints and pipes with pencils in hand. They laughed and cried together. They praised and critiqued each other’s writings. They spurred one another on toward love and good deeds. Surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses, they encouraged one another to run the race set before them with endurance. They had a common faith in the nativity, resurrection, and ascension of our Lord and God and Savior Jesus Christ in the flesh. They fasted together in preparation for the annual commemoration of those world-changing events. And they feasted together with the joy of the knowledge that with the eighth day resurrection old things have passed away and all things are being made new (2 Cor. 5:17).

May we follow in their footsteps. May this small cloud of witnesses whom we call the Inklings spur us on toward love and good deeds. May their example of ascetic flight and intellectually coherent and festive fight encourage us to run the race set before us with strength and endurance. And may our common celebration of their lives and literary works be to the glory of our triune God and His Son’s glorious three-day resurrection for the life of the world. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Feast of St. Luke the Evangelist & Physician
Anno Domini 2019, October 18

Erin Doom is the founder and director of Eighth Day Institute. He lives in Wichita, KS with his wife Christiane and their four children, Caleb Michael, Hannah Elizabeth, Elijah Blaise, and Esther Ruth.

*Originally published in the Program for the fifth annual Inklings Oktoberfest, October 18, 2019.



Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts