Why I Run: Eight Theses Toward a Theology of Running

by Erin Doom


Feast of St Lucia the Virgin Martyr

Anno Domini 2021, December 13

1. Running is Christ-Strengthening: I have the sort of personality that loves—no thrives on—a good challenge. Running 13.1 miles, then 26.2 miles, then 31 (first 50k back in Sep) and 62 miles (first 100k last month), and now 88 miles. I absolutely love the challenge of running these long distances. Pushing through all the trials and pain of 62 miles has taught me that in and with Christ I truly can do just about anything I put my mind to. Over the last couple of races, Philippians 4:13 has come so alive. I clung to it as I set off on my longest run yet.

 

2. Running requires Continual Learning: Running is a constant experiment in figuring out how to improve, how to run longer, how to deal with pain, what went wrong, what changes need to be made for next run. On every race I’ve run, I’ve had to troubleshoot. My first 50k, for example, I was staying at an Airbnb and I got up at 4 am to drive to the race but found myself blocked in the driveway by two vehicles. I had to pound on the door of a complete stranger for about 15 minutes to wake them up and get them to move their cars. In hindsight, I’m grateful I was blocked in because I would have left my running gear behind if I hadn’t gone back into the Airbnb. Or today, for example, I forgot I hadn’t used my water bottle and spent the first five minutes of the very first lap trying to get the wrapper off only to pull the whole thing apart. I was eventually able to get it back together. The point is that I love learning which is not only key to running, but also vital to the Christian faith, for as Fr Florovsky tirelessly preached, Christ took on our full humanity, including the human mind. And so His redemption of humanity includes the redeeming of our minds. And again, in Florovsky’s words, “as disciples we are students and thus have a duty to learn.”

 

3. Running gives Focus and Creativity: I am easily distracted. Running is teaching me how to focus on one thing instead of a million. For me it has been a world of silence in the midst of a world of distractions and noise. That space for silence and focus has also frequently spurred creativity.

 

4. Running offers Communion with God: Running has catapulted my prayer life. Long runs give you hours alone…just me and God. And the trail runs provide those hours in nature, which for me has been yet another way of being in communion with God.

 

5. Running is a Form of Asceticism: Asceticism comes from two Greek words: 1) askoumai which denotes something a man practices aiming for a certain goal; and 2) askein which simply means to exercise. So Christian asceticism are those practices or exercises that submit the body to the soul thereby aiming toward the goal of holiness and theosis. Running has been a great practice at establishing discipline and teaching my body to submit to my mind and soul.

 

6. Running requires Perseverance and Suffering: If you run long distances, it’s going to be hard and you’re going to hurt. You can’t avoid the pain. And you will want to quit. About half way into the 88-mile run I concluded that a theology of running is really just a theology of suffering. When I was a young teenager my dad and I memorized the book of James. The thing that has stuck with me the most from that exercise is the opening verses of the book (vv. 2-4): “Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance. Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.” That’s a message that completely contradicts the American way of life. But I believe it to be true. We ought not expect to be comfortable. We have to be ready and willing to die to ourselves, to embrace pain and suffering, to embrace the cross, to participate in Christ’s suffering through our own…that’s the message of the gospel. And running long distances, persevering and feeling the pain, is for me a way to practice that.

 

7. Running is a Form of Vigil: If you run long enough distances, you’ll have to run through the night. On my first 100k I started in the morning, ran all day, and then into the night, finally finishing around 3 am. On the 88-mile run, I ran through the entire night. On both occasions, when I wasn’t accompanied by a fellow runner, those dark hours alone were times for prayer. St. Isaac the Syrian has an entire homily devoted to the power of a vigil, i.e., of praying at night. Here’s one line: “Prayer offered up at night possesses a great power, more so than the prayer of the daytime. All the righteous prayed during the night… There is nothing which even Satan fears so much as prayer that is offered during vigilance at night.”

 

8. Running requires Community: You can only run so far before you’re going to need help. You just can’t run really long distances without assistance. You may have seen aid stations for a marathon where volunteers provide water and Gatorade. Aid stations on a long trail run take that to a whole other level. Volunteers not only provide hydration, but they also have all sorts of food options for you. When you’re burning 400-500 calories every hour, you have to put calories back in to be able to keep going. It’s also not uncommon to get a bit disoriented—it happened to me when I stopped in at an aid station at mile 50—and those volunteers can be life-saving. Some runners bring their own crew to help them out at critical junctures in a long race. And they’ll often have a pacer join them in the latter portion of the race. Again, the mind is not able to think as clearly when you’ve been running that long so pacers can be very helpful in various ways. As it was not good for man to be alone in the garden, it is not good for a runner to be alone on a long run.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts