The Local Option: A Review of The Curiosities of Ale

Reviewed by Arthur Machen


Feast of St James the Apostle, Brother of our Lord

Anno Domini 2021, October 23

The Curiosities of Ale reviewed by Arthur Machen

Originally printed in Walford’s Antiquarian, April 1887, pp. 229-232

Reprinted in Machen, A Reader of Curious Books (Darkly Bright Press, 2020), 29-32; available at Eighth Day Books.


It is clear that Aeschylus the Athenian had but a poor opinion of the virtues of ale; at all events, in his “Supplies” we find a character thus expressing himself:—


But the stout inmates of this brave old land

Ye will not find ale-bibbers.


The “brave old land” in question is Egypt; and with Egypt Mr. Bickerdyke begins his Institutes of Ale. Four thousand years ago, if the records “hid under Egypt’s pyramid” lie not, the land of the Nile was convulsed by a kind of Local Option movement, which resulted in a wholesale closing of beer-shops. Truly “the thing that hath been, it is that which shall be,” but beer-shops, so far, seem in no peril of becoming extinct. Mr. Bickerdyke makes but the brief stay of a paragraph in Egypt, and before long we find ourselves in Medieval England, the happy hunting-ground of the antiquarian. Divers weighty questions have to be propounded, and, if possible, resolved. A kind of beery mist rises like a veil before us, into which we peer, and vainly endeavor to discern the date of the bringing in of hops. In a letter of donations under the hand of the great King Pepin we find mention of a “humularia,” or hop-gardens, and it seems probable that hops were known, though not generally used, in Saxon times. Naturally there is a good deal about the regular clergy, commonly called “the old monks,” who have somehow acquired the reputation of being Pantagruelists before Pantagruel. However that may be, it seems certain that they had a great reverence for ale, and were sticklers for their daily allowance, requiring both quality and quantity to be above suspicion, or perhaps we should say, above proof. Awful legends are told in the monastic annals concerning the turpitude of one Roger Norreys, known as “The Wicked Abbot of Evesham.” His monks bore with him and his sins for some while, but at last, on his compelling them “to drink ale little stronger than water,” they revolted, and petitioned the Archbishop. Roger, however, seems to have taken good care to drink of the strong himself, and resembled in this point the abbot of the rhyme:


Bonum vinum cum sapore

Bibit Abbas cum Priore,

Sed conventus de pejore

Semper solet bibere.


           [Good wine with flavor

           The Abbot drinks with the Prior,

           But the the worse, the monastic community

Is always used to drinking.]

           

The old maxim was that the cellarer “Pater debet esse totius congregationis” [should be father of the whole convent]; a touching proof of the high estimate in which the office was held. Full particulars are given in this admirable work of the exact allowance of ale served out to the monks, both on ordinary days and on the high days when everybody was busily engaged in “doing the great O”—that is, nothing. Next we have the witness of the poets concerning ale, from the author of “Piers the Plowman,” Chaucer and Taylor, the water poet, to the nameless quire of ballad-makers. Their testimony may be summed up in the words of one of them:


Mas Mault he is a gentleman,

And hath been since the world began; Never yet knew I any man

That could match with Master Mault.


The various species of Church ales furnish Mr. Bickerdyke with another topic. These Church ales seem to have been a very sensible method of raising money, and appear to the main to have been free from scandal. In the seventeenth century, however, “some melancholy swains” persuaded the English people that


The morrice-idols, Whitsun-ales can be

But prophane reliques of a jubilee.


They passed away therefore, like many a goodly old observance, from the English life, but are still dear to the antiquary’s heart. In reading Mr. Bickerdyke’s book we are often moved to sigh over the degenerate days in which we live. Take, for instance, this list of the contents of a gentleman’s cellar in the twelfth century:


In promptuario sive in celario sunt cadi, utres, dolea, ciphi, vina, scicera, cervicia, mustum, claretum, nectar, medo sive ydromellum, piretum, vinum rosetum, vinum falernum, vinum girofilatum.


[In the storeroom or in the cellar there are barrels, bottles, casks, cups, wine, strong cider, ale, partially fermented grape must, claret, nectar, mead or ydromellum (sweet liquor wort), perry, rose wine, falernum wine, garihofilac wine.]


What gentleman could now refresh his guest with a glass of vinum girofilatum? Too often we fear, in these days of reduced rents, the list might stand thus: “In celario sunt cadi,” all serving merely to illustrate the lines:


Quo semel est imbuta recens servabit odorem

Testa diu.

 

[The first scent you pour in a jar lasts for years.]


And what would have been said by the Dissenters if 300 tuns of ale, 100 tuns of wine, and “one pynt of hypocrass” had been consumed at the enthronement of the Archbishop of Canterbury? Yet in the days of Edward IV, a mere Archbishop of York thus entertained his guests. Much curious lore has been gathered and stored in these “Curiosities” on the matter of signs. Firstly we have the bush (which good wine needs not), then the ale-stake, or ale-pole, and lastly the painted or figured sign, sometimes seen combined with the primitive bush. The most elaborate sign on record is that of the White Hart at Norwich, mentioned by Sir Thomas Brown in 1663. It was in 1655, and is said to have cost £1,000. There were on it “a great many stories as of Charon and Cerberus, Actaeon and Diana,” and this masterpiece of carved and painted work remained undestroyed till the end of the last century. A poor wit; a member of the “shoe-black seraph” gild of authors, was once staying at the White Horse, on the old Bath road, and having (we may safely assume) eaten of the fat and drunken of the strong, had to spend such another quarter of an hour as that memorable in Rabelaisian story. But the landlord was generous and forgave the author his score, and he, in return, wrote large beneath the sign (naming other inns in the neighborhood):


My White Horse shall beat the Bear,

           And make the Angel fly;

Shall turn the Ship quite bottom-up,

           And drink the Three Cups dry.


By the kindess of Messrs. Field & Tuer we are able to give two of the cuts which quaintly adorn “The Curiosities of Ale and Beer,” and our readers may rest assured, that if these but meagerly represent the illustrations, our remarks do scarcely more justice to the letterpress. The Athenaeum, in reviewing the work, declared that it ought to have been dedicated to “the most noble and illustrious tosspots and thrice precious profligates” of Rabelais’ Prologue; and so say we, for these “Curiosities” are “fair, goodly books, stuffed with high conceptions.”

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap June 9, 2026
In Memory of Warren Farha, 1955-2026
By Jeremy Wagner May 15, 2026
An Ode to St. Brendan the Voyager
More Posts