The Conception of Mary

by Fr Thomas Hopko


Feast of St Herman of Alaska

Anno Domini 2020, December 13



On the ninth of December the Orthodox Church celebrates the feast of the conception of the Virgin Mary by her parents Joachim and Anna. [Note: This feast is officially called The Conception of the Theotokos. Mary’s nativity is celebrated on September 8. A popular tradition among the Orthodox says that the nine-month period is purposely off by one day to illustrate the “mere humanity” of Mary, unlike the “divine humanity” of her Son, whose conception on the feast of the Annunciation is celebrated on March 25, exactly nine months before His Nativity.] On this major festival which finds its place in the Church’s preparation for Christmas, the faithful rejoice in the event by which Mary is conceived in fulfillment of her parents’ prayers in order to be formed in the womb, born on the earth, dedicated to the Lord, and nurtured in holiness to become by God’s grace the mother of His Son the Messiah.


In addition to the songs of the services, there are icons and frescoes of the feast which the faithful venerate and kiss, depicting the holy couple in a loving embrace within their conjugal chamber.


Matins of the Feast of the Conception of the Theotokos

O Adam and Eve, lay aside your sorrow,

Behold, a barren womb today wondrously bears fruit:

The Mother of our Joy!


O Father Abraham and all the patriarchs,

Rejoice greatly, seeing your seed blossom:

The Mother of our God!


Rejoice, O Anna! O Joachim, rejoice!

Today in wondrous manner you bear to the world

The fruit of grace and salvation!


O choir of prophets, rejoice exceedingly!

For behold, today Anna bears the holy fruit

You foretold us.


Rejoice, all nations!

The barren Anna conceives the fruit of her womb;

By persevering in hope, she bears our life!


Rejoice, O ends of the earth!

Behold the barren mother conceives her

Who without human seed will bear the Creator of all!


Today a royal robe of purple and fine linen

Is woven from the loins of David.

The mystical flower of Jesse is blossoming

From which comes Christ our God, the Savior of our souls.


The Orthodox Church, particularly in the present time, does not call the feast of Mary’s beginning the “immaculate conception,” although perhaps in ancient times this title would have been fully acceptable. This is not because the Orthodox consider Mary’s conception to have been somehow “maculate” or “stained” (macula means “stain” in Latin). It simply means that the Orthodox do not want to support the conviction that God had somehow to intervene at the moment of Mary’s conception with a special action to remove the “stain” of the original sin transmitted by the act of human reproduction because, simply put, the Orthodox do not hold that such a “stain” exists.


The Orthodox Church affirms original sin. Orthodox theology teaches that all human beings, including the Virgin Mary who is a “mere human” like the rest of us—unlike her Son Jesus who is a “real human” but not a “mere human” because He is the incarnate Son and Word of God—are born into a fallen, death-bound, demon-riddled world whose “form is passing away” (1 Cor. 7:31). We are all born mortal and tending toward sin. But we are not born guilty of any personal sin, certainly not one allegedly committed “in Adam.” Nor are we born stained because of the manner in which we are conceived by the sexual union of our parents. If sexual union in marriage is in any sense sinful, or the cause in itself of any sinfulness or stain, even in the conditions of the “fallen world,” then, as even the rigorous Saint John Chrysostom has taught, God is the sinner because He made us this way, male and female, from the very beginning (cf. On Titus, Homily 2).


The Orthodox Church teaches that it is possible by. the grace of God, with whom all things are possible, for sexual union in marriage, even in the present condition of things, to be good, holy, beautiful, loving, and pure. The proof of this is the feast of Joachim and Anna’s conception of Mary (and Zacharias and Elizabeth’s conception of John the Baptist), with no mention whatsoever of any “stain” having to be removed by a special action of God, certainly not one connected with the manner in which the conception occurs. [Note: The Orthodox Church celebrates the feast of the Conception of the Holy Prophet, Forerunner, and Baptist John on September 23. His nativity is celebrated on June 24; again the nine-month period is off by one day. A movement existed among some Roman Catholics at the beginning of the twentieth century which unsuccessfully argued that the Church should teach the “immaculate conception” of Saint John.]


Mary is conceived by her parents as we are all conceived. But in her case it is a pure act of faith and love, in obedience to God’s will, as an answer to prayer. In this sense her conception is truly “immaculate.” And its fruit is the woman who remains forever the most pure Virgin and Mother of God.


Vespers for the Prefeast of the Conception of the Theotokos

Come, let us dance in the Spirit!

Let us sing worthy praises to Christ!

Let us celebrate the joy of Joachim and Anna,

The conception of the Mother of our God,

For she is the fruit of the grace of God.


Vespers for the Feast of the Conception of the Theotokos

Anna besought the Lord in fervent prayer for a child.

The voice of the angel proclaimed to her:

God has granted you the desire of your prayer.

Do not weep, for you shall be a fruitful vine,

Bearing the wondrous branch of the Virgin

Who will bring forth in the flesh the blossom of Christ,

Who grants great mercy to the world.


Today the great mystery of all eternity,

Whose depths angels and men cannot perceive,

Appears in the barren womb of Anna.

Mary, the Maiden of God, is prepared to be the dwelling place of the eternal King

Who will renew human nature.

Let us entreat her with a pure heart and say:

Intercede for us with your Son and god

That our souls may be saved.


*From Thomas Hopko, The Winter Pascha (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997), 41-44. Available for purchase at Eighth Day Books.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap June 9, 2026
In Memory of Warren Farha, 1955-2026
By Jeremy Wagner May 15, 2026
An Ode to St. Brendan the Voyager
More Posts