Sin

by St John of Damscus


Feast of Sts Manuel, Sabel, & Ishmael the Martyrs of Persia

Anno Domini 2022, June 17

94. Why God created those whom he foreknew would sin and not repent

God in His goodness brings what exists out of non-being into being and has foreknowledge of what will happen. If, then, they were not going to exist, they were neither going to be evil, nor would they be foreknown to be evil. For knowledge is of what exists, and foreknowledge is necessarily of what is going to exist. For existence comes first and then being either good or evil. but if those who were going to exist through God’s goodness were prevented from coming into existence because they were going to be evil through their own deliberate choice, then evil would have prevailed over God’s goodness. Everything that God makes He most certainly makes as good. Each of us becomes good or evil by our own deliberate choice. Even if the Lord said: “It would have been better for that one not to have been born” (Matt. 26:24), He did not say it in disparagement of His own creation but because evil had happened to His creature through that creature’s own deliberate choice and indolence. For the creature made the Creator’s benefaction useless to itself through the indolence of its own will. It is as if someone who had been entrusted with wealth and authority by a king were to rebel against his benefactor. He would rightly be overpowered and punished if the king saw that he was persisting in his rebellion to the end.


95. On the law of God and the law of sin

The divine is good and supremely good, as is also its will. For what is good is what God wills. A law (nomos) is the commandment that teaches this, that by abiding in it we may be in light. The transgression of this commandment is sin. The latter is brought about through the assault of the devil and our own unforced and voluntary consent. This too is called a law.


Therefore when the law of God enters our mind it draws it towards itself and pricks our conscience. Our own conscience is also called a law of our mind. Moreover, the assault of the evil one, that is to say, the law of sin, enters the members of our flesh and attacks us through it. For once we have voluntarily transgressed the law of God and have consented to the assault of the evil one, we have allowed it entry, having sold ourselves to sin. Hence our body is easily induced to sin. And so the scent and sensation of sin stored up in our body, that is to say, the body’s desire and pleasure, is also called a law in the members of our flesh.


Thus on the one hand the law of my mind, that is to say, my conscience, is in harmony with the law of God, that is to say, the commandment, and desires it. But on the other hand, the law of sin, which is to say, the assault that comes about through the law that is in my members, which is to say, the desire and inclination and movement of the irrational part of the soul, fights against the law of my mind, that is to say, my conscience, and takes me prisoner, even though I desire the law of God and love it and do not desire sin, and by a blending, through the softness of pleasure and the desire of the body and the irrational part of the soul, as I have said, leads me astray and persuades me to become a slave to sin. But “God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh” (for He assumed flesh but in no way did He assume sin) “He condemned sin in the flesh, so that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in those who walk not according to the felsh but according to the Spirit” (Rom. 8:3-4). For “the Spirit helps us in our weakness” (Rom. 8:26) and gives strength to the law of our mind against the law that is in our members. For the text, “we do not know how to pray as we ought, but the Spirit itself intercedes for us with sighs too deep for words” (Rom. 8:26), teaches us what we should pray for. In consequence, it is impossible to fulfill God’s commandments except through patience and prayer.


*St. John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Chs. 94-95, translated by Norman Russell (Yonkers, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2022), pp. 277-279.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap June 9, 2026
In Memory of Warren Farha, 1955-2026
By Jeremy Wagner May 15, 2026
An Ode to St. Brendan the Voyager
More Posts