On Staretz Silouan

by Fr Georges Florovsky


Feast of the Holy Monk Martyr Anastasius the Persian

Anno Domini 2021, January 22


St. Silouan the Athonite - d. A.D. 1938, 24 September


Father Silouan was a humble man. But his teaching was daring. It was not a daring of the inquisitive mind, engaged in speculative scrutiny and argument. It was a daring of spiritual assurance. For, in the words of the Father himself, “the perfect never say anything of themselves, they only say what the Spirit gives them to say.” Father Silouan, surely, must be counted among the perfect. Now, this “perfection” is the fruit of humility. It can be acquired—and, what is no less important, kept and preserved—only by a constant and continuous effort of self-humbling and self-denial. This process of self-abnegation, however, is not just a negative endeavor. It is not just a denial, a subtraction, or a reduction of the self. On the contrary, it is a recovery of the true self. The process is initiated by faith and love. One denies one’s own self for Christ’s sake because of the great love for Him. The process is guided by a positive purpose. The objective is always constructive. It is “the acquiring of the Holy Spirit,” as St. Seraphim of Sarov used to say. There is here, indeed, a paradoxical tension. The purpose of the spiritual quest is high and ambitious: consortium divinae naturae, “a participation in the Divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4). In whatever manner this startling phrase of the Scripture may be interpreted, it points out, clearly and distinctly, to the ultimate goal of all Christian existence: “life everlasting,” life “in Christ,” “fellowship of the Holy Ghost.” The Greek Fathers used even the daring expression: theosis, “divinization.” Yet, the method, i.e., precisely “the way,” by which this goal can be attained, is the method of radical self-renunciation. Grace is given only to the humble and the meek. Moreover, humility itself is never a human achievement. It is always the gift of God, granted freely, gratia gratis data. The whole structure of spiritual life is indeed paradoxical. The riches of the Kingdom are given only to the poor. And with the riches authority is also given. The humble do not say anything of their own. Yet, they speak, with authority, whenever they are moved to speak at all. They do not claim any authority for themselves. But they claim authority for that which has been disclosed, through their mediation, from above. Otherwise they would keep silence. “But you have an anointing from the Holy One and you know all things (1 John 2:20).


The sayings of Father Silouan are simple. There is nothing spectacular in them, except indeed their simplicity itself. He had no special “revelations” to disclose. He spoke usually about common things. Yet even about the common things he spoke in a very uncommon manner. He spoke out of his intimate experience. Love is both the starting point and the core of Christian endeavour. But the “novelty” of the Christian Love is so often overlooked and disregarded. According to Christ Himself, the only true Love is “love for enemies.” It is in no case just a super-rogatory advice, and not just a free option. It is rather the first criterium, and the distinctive mark, of the genuine Love. St. Paul was also quite emphatical at this point. God loved us while we were His enemies. The Cross itself is the perennial symbol and sign of that Love. Now, Christians must share in that redemptive Love of their Lord. Otherwise they cannot “abide in His Love.” Father Silouan not only spoke of Love. He practised it. In a humble, and yet daring, manner he devoted his life to the prayer for enemies, for the perishing and alienated world. This prayer is a dangerous and ambiguous endeavour, unless it is offered in utter humility. One can easily become conscious of his love, and then it is corroded and infected by vanity and pride. One cannot love purely, except with the love of Christ Himself, infused and operating in the humble heart. One cannot be a “saint,” except one knows that he is himself but a “miserable sinner,” in the utter need of help and forgiveness. And yet the Grace of God washes away all stain and heals all infirmity. The glory of the Saints is manifested in their humility, just as the glory of the Only Begotten has been manifested in the utter humiliation of His earthly life. Love itself has been crucified in the world.


In his spiritual ascent Father Silouan went through the saddening experience of the “dark night,” of utter loneliness and abandonment. And yet there was nothing grim or morbid in him. He was always calm and quiet, always radiant with joy. As we learn from the story of his life, this joy has been acquired by a long and exacting contest, by an unceasing “invisible warfare.” Left alone, man is left to despair and desolation. Salvation is only in the Lord. The soul must cling to Him. Man is never left alone, except he chooses himself to leave God. Father Silouan knew by experience the dread and dangers of the outer darkness. But he also learned by experience the immensity of the Divine Love. It shines even over the abyss of trials, torments, and tribulation. Precisely because God is Love.


Father Silouan stands in a long and venerable tradition. Nor was he alone even in his own time. There was in every generation a cloud of witnesses to the Mysteries of the Kingdom. Our predicament is in that we do not know them, nor do we care for them and for their witness. We are overtaken by worldly cares. The story of Father Silouan is a timely reminder for our generation of that only “good thing,” which is never taken away. It is also an invitation to the pilgrimage of faith and hope.


Georges Florovsky

Harvard Divinity School


*Foreword to Archimandrite Sophrony, The Undistorted Image: Staretz Silouan – 1866-1938, translated by Rosemary Edmonds (London: The Faith Press, 1958), pp. 5-6. The Undistorted Image has been republished as The Monk of Mount Athos: Staretz Silouan 1866-1938 (unfortunately without Florovsky's Foreword) and is available for purchase at Eighth Day Books, along with its companion volume Wisdom from Mount Athos: The Writings of Staretz Silouan.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap June 9, 2026
In Memory of Warren Farha, 1955-2026
By Jeremy Wagner May 15, 2026
An Ode to St. Brendan the Voyager
More Posts