A Holy Mother's Day

by Mark Mosley


Thomas Sunday and the Feast of the Holy Prophet Isaiah

Anno Domini 2021, May 9



A mother is defined by a woman who becomes pregnant. One who was barren has been given a divine gift. The womb has been planted with seed, and from this ground has risen new life. A separate person lives inside the woman.

 

The fruit of this vine has been delivered to the world. We call this labor. This sacrificial work is the crux of motherhood. In the ancient Jewish world (and even in most places until recently), giving birth held great risk and peril in the possible death of the mother. In giving new life, she risks the sacrifice of her own. That pain of labor, and even death, is the price extracted for the Fall of Eve.

 

The quintessential Biblical picture of this martyrdom of motherhood is Rachel. Rachel was the favorite of Jacob (Israel). Though she was barren, she ultimately became the mother of Joseph and Benjamin, the last two of the twelve sons of Jacob (Israel). While many of us remember the story of Joseph, who was sold for twenty pieces of silver by Judah but then became royalty and saved his people as well as the gentiles (Egyptians), we are less familiar with the story of Benjamin.

 

It is during Benjamin’s delivery that Rachel, his mother, dies. In her demise during labor she names her son, Benoni, which means “son of my sorrow.” Rachel’s body is not buried in the family burial plot, which would have been traditional for a Jewish family, but is rather buried in Ephratha, the ancient name for Bethlehem. Jacob (Israel) alters the name Benoni to Benjamin, meaning “son of the right hand” (Gen. 35:16-20).

 

This would be little more than a tragic story of an ancient heroic mother, if not for the prophecy of Jeremiah. While the people of Israel (the descendants of the twelve sons of Jacob) are in pain in Babylonian captivity awaiting to be delivered, to be “born again” into the land promised by God the Father, they “cry out” like a woman in childbirth.

 

Thus says the LORD, a voice is heard in Ramah, lamentation and weeping.

Rachel is weeping for her children. She refuses to be comforted by her children because they are not. (Jeremiah 31:15)

 

We learn in Jeremiah’s prophecy that the people of Israel not only remembered Rachael, the bride of Israel and the mother of the children of Israel, but they also viewed her as an ongoing type of matriarchal presence in Ephratha who laments and intercedes to God for her children who were in captivity. According to the Jewish rabbinic tradition,

 

Jacob foresaw that the exiles would pass on from thence, therefore he buried her so that she might pray mercy for them.  (Genesis Rabbah 82:10)

 

In his book Jesus and the Roots of Mary, Brant Pitre, Professor of Scripture at the Augustine Institute, notes that “through the centuries, Jews, Christians, and Muslims have come to the traditional site of Rachel’s tomb near the city of Bethlehem as a holy place of prayer. In the 20th century, we even have records of Jews visiting Rachel’s tomb to light candles and ask for her prayers.”

 

Rachel is the symbol of the suffering mother for all of Israel. Her connection is not only found in the prophet Jeremiah and the Psalms (132:6), but also in the New Testament in Matthew 2:16-21 when Herod slaughters the innocent firstborn males of Israel, and Rachel, though buried in Ephratha, is made present “weeping for her children.”

 

Rachel, the bride of Israel, the birth-giver to Joseph (who is a type of Jesus), is the birth-giver of “the son of sorrow” who becomes the “son of the right hand.” Though passed from this life, she weeps for all of her children. She makes intercession when her children are threatened with captivity or death. In the same way that King David was born in Ephratha and reopened the messianic lineage of Israel, so too Jesus, son of David, again reopens the messianic lineage of Israel. This is prophesied by Micah: “Ephratha…out of you shall come forth to me the One to be ruler of Israel…” (Micah 5:1). It is Rachel’s lamentation and weeping for her children that escort Mary and the Christ child away from Ephratha to escape into Egypt, the same land to which Joseph escaped from death. From the grave, Rachel’s ancient cry is a message to this faithfully Jewish Mary.

 

Rachel is the prefigurement of Mary, the bride, the birth-giver of Jesus who is “a man of sorrow” (“the suffering servant” of Is. 53:3). Mary is both the new Eve and the new Rachel. What was defiled in Eden and buried in Ephratha has been made pure in Bethlehem and risen to a heavenly Jerusalem at the right hand of God the Father with her Son.

 

But the labor pains of Mary, the Theotokos (bearer of God), were at Golgatha. Here is where she cries out and laments the pain of motherhood. Here is where she speaks the unspeakable, that her Son, promised by the angel Gabriel as the Son of God, would be a “man of sorrows” and “acquainted with grief.”

 

Christ’s own words speak directly to this maternal connection from Eve to Rachel to Mary (Jn. 16:21-22). The image of the Day of the LORD being a time of great suffering like a pregnant woman in labor runs from the Old Testament to the Cross to the Last Day described in John’s Revelation as a woman clothed in the sun. (Is. 13:6-9; Zeph. 1:14, 15, 18; Joel 2:30, 31; Matt. 24:4-8, 29; 1 Thess. 5:2, 3; Rev. 6:15).

 

And like Eve and Rachel, Mary becomes a type of mother for all of God’s people, the mother of the resurrected living, and the mother of the children of the New Israel. Mary who is the first Christian who accepts Jesus inside of her, is also the embodiment of the Church, the Theotokos, the one who bears God. The title Theotokos, the mother of God, is not a late invention by the Church. It is in the Bible where we read that Mary is “the mother of my Lord” (Lk. 1:43). In the same way that John the Baptizer recognizes Christ in Mary’s womb and becomes the prophetic voice that prepares the way for the Son of God, so too Elizabeth recognizes Mary’s role and becomes the prophetic voice that prepares the way for the mother of God.

 

The Church is the bride of God, the bearer of the Son of God, the mother of all of God’s children, the queen mother of the King of Heaven, the ark who has the WORD of God contained inside her incorruptible chamber, the third temple, the one who must bear the weight of the cross at Christ’s feet knowing her pain is a lament, a sword that pierces her soul (Lk. 2:34-35), who carries the promise of life to the world. And like Rachel, she makes intercession on behalf of her children, of which the Holy Apostle John becomes her first adopted child: “…behold Thy mother.”

 

For those of you who are uneasy with Mary, the Theotokos, being called the queen of heaven, or ark, or incorruptible, or one making intercession (“save us,” “rescue us”)—these are not “Roman Catholic” inventions—these are Biblical Jewish images. These poetic images of veneration and intercession by a “Holy mother” are deeply Hebraic and thoroughly Biblical in the Old and New Testaments long before Roman Catholicism was an entity. It is the modern Protestant Church that has lost her mother.

 

On this Mother’s Day, be not grateful only for your earthly mother who risked her life to give you birth, and wept for you when you were away from her, and continued to intercede for you throughout your life—but give thanks to “the mother of my Lord” (Lk. 1:43). She is the one woman that “all generations shall call blessed among women” (Lk. 1:28, 46-55).

 

During Christmas many Christians are willing to recall Mary’s song, The Magnificat. During this Feast of the Nativity, Orthodox Christians sing beyond the notes of “Little Town of Bethlehem”; we chant the ancient tones of “O House of Ephratha.” Mary is not just a lucky girl chosen by God whom we remember for a season, or a mother we think of just on one day—she is the mother we ask to pray with us and for us, as the Jews did with Rachel.

 

When we sing of Mary, we assume Rachel. The holy mothers of Ephratha are mothers who suffer for love. Mary holds Christ and cares for Him. She weeps for Christ. She cares for Christ’s offspring, the “little Christs” called Christians. She intercedes for God’s people as a holy mother in heaven at the right hand by her Son. And we on earth light candles and by intercessory prayer ask for prayers not only among those on earth but also those in heaven. Death does not separate us from the love of God. Neither does it separate us from the love of His mother.

Share this Post on Your Preferred Platform

By Mark C. Watney August 25, 2026
Inside the head of my three-month-old granddaughter, Lucy, said G.K. Chesterton is, "a new universe, as new as it was on the seventh day of creation...a new system of stars, new grass, new cities...and new seas." And this is because, he adds: The gravity of astonishment at the universe...dwells in the eyes of a baby three-months-old [and] the universe is put upon its trial and forces us actually to remodel our conduct...we seem to be dealing with a new race, only to be seen through a microscope...[with] delightful bulbous heads, three times too big for the body. But Chesterton's central thesis in this essay is not that babies are so marvelous, but that our treatment of each other as adults, in contrast, is so broken. "It is our attitude towards grown-up people that is wrong," he writes, because we no longer see each other with astonishment and wonder (unless, that is, we are falling in love). But babies remind us that humans really are astonishing, and this "revolutionary theory of the marvelousness of all things" should force us to "remodel our conduct" toward everyone we meet. A baby seems to be a necessary icon for us, correcting our eyesight which grows old and struggles to see "the weight of glory" in each other as teenagers, adults, and perhaps especially, as old people. Even though he did not reference icons in his essay, we seem to drift very easily into what could be called a type of iconoclasm, an inability to see each other as image bearers of God Himself. William Wordsworth describes us as "trailing clouds of glory" when we first arrive here "from God, who is our home." But soon, he says, "shades of the prison-house" begin to smother us, and we forget. "We bow to grown people," says Chesterton in this same essay, "take off our hats to them, refrain from contradicting them flatly, but we do not appreciate them properly." God speaks to us, like we are working through in St. John of Damascus , through the "cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology," or literally from the spoken word (cataphatic) or unspeakable word (apophatic). Apophatic I noticed has the same root in Greek as Infant does in Latin. Both mean "unspoken." God has given us both bibles and babies, speechless wonders through which He means to unglaze our eyes and fill us with astonishment. MARK C. WATNEY is professor emeritus at Sterling College, assisting in its newly established C. S. Lewis Center. He has given papers at Harvard's Center for Hellenic Studies and Dordt College
By Michael Simmon August 25, 2026
"God became man, so that man might become God." St. Athanasius the Great, On the Incarnation (54:3)  These words from St. Athanasius may sound, at first blush, provocative. However, St. Athanasius is restating, perhaps more simply, what St. Peter says in his second epistle: the promise of being united to Christ is that men and women made in His image will partake in His divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Paul Kingsnorth's latest book, Against the Machine, inverts this idea and opens our eyes to the world emerging at a rapid rate, the world dominated by what he calls The Machine. The new mantra of The Machine age is, instead, this: Man will become God by Man's own self-creation. Reading Kingsnorth is not for the faint of heart. It's easy to be overcome by despair. The goal of the Machine age is "transhumanism", to be liberated from the constraints of the body. For the transhumanist (self-described), the future is disembodied. The future is limitless. But this is not liberation. Because the Machine is not limited to the physical world, it follows naturally there is a spiritual nature to this lifestyle, what he ultimately identifies as a manisfestation and/or manipulation of the demonic. Whether or not you agree with his ultimate conclusion, we can see its effects. An entire generation, and many across generations, addicted to screens. Disintegration of communal life, most disastrously in the breakdown of the family. Increasing rates of loneliness, depression, and suicide, especially among children. It's clear we need a Savior, and the Machine isn't it. Instead, Kingsnorth encourages us toward a revival of community, men, women, and children living embodied lives in the same space and time: working together, eating together, worshipping together, loving each other, carrying each other's burdens. If this sounds like Eighth Day Institute...if this sounds like what the Church is meant to be, it is because this is exactly what the Church is. We are saved together in Christ. MICHAEL SIMMON currently serves as the Secretary of Eighth Day Institute Board of Directors and Coordinator for Hall of Men. He resides in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and four children.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 31, 2026
"What is it that has ordered the things of heaven and those of earth, the things which move through the air and those which move in the water; nay, rather the things which proceeded them: heaven and earth and the natures of fire and water? What is it that combined and arranged them...set them into motion and put them on their unceasing and unhindered course?..But who is the architect of these things? Or did not he who made them also bring them into being? We shall certainly not attribute such power to spontaneity." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 3 This comes after St. John of Damascus sets out to delineate between the created and the uncreated, a fact which, while at the core of existence, seems for him to be, for this very reason, the simplest to believe. Everything but God is created and, thus, susceptible to change. This means people, but this also means demons, angels, the rest of the created order across the entire cosmos. Everything is vulnerable to unrest. Except for God. If you have ever tried to explain the Holy Trinity to a child for the first time, maybe you have felt as I have the weightier, inexpressible side of God's unchangeability: how do I possibly communicate this essential fact to the person in front of me? (This is usually when my faint stutter starts to pop up again.) I like that here, like St. Patrick reaching for a three-leaf clover, St. John brings us back to earth to better understand the cosmos. Fire and water are no less mysteries than heaven and earth. And yet here we are, cooking and washing, eating and drinking, filled and sustained on what we can neither fully explain nor claim to have created. Only God is unchanging. Vice versa, God is the only constant we need. Maybe the rest is better left unsaid. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 24, 2026
"Now, one who would speak or hear about God should know beyond any doubt that in what concerns theology and the Incarnation not all things are inexpressible and not all are capable of expression, and neither are all things unknowable nor are they all knowable. That which can be known is one thing, whereas that which can be said is another, just as it is one thing to speak and another to know. Furthermore, many of those things about God which are not clearly perceived cannot be fittingly described, so that we are obliged to express in human terms things which transcend the human order. Thus, for example, in speaking about God we attribute to Him sleep, anger, indifference, hands and feet, and the like." On the Orthodox Faith, Chapter 2 When I was studying Fiction in graduate school, one of the first methods I learned to really situate the reader in the story you were about to tell them was disorientation; if you wanted to ground them in one story, first you had pull the rug out from under their feet. So it's fitting that in the beginning of St. John Damascene's On the Orthodox Faith, before rebuilding our foundation, he first puts us squarely in limbo, seesawing back and forth between certainty and uncertainty. To paraphrase, there is no doubt (certainty) that about God some things can be expressed...but not all things (uncertainty). Some things about God are truly knowable (certainty), but some are unknowable (uncertainty). Oh, and while we're speaking about God (certainty), let's admit there's a gap, too, between what we say and what we know (uncertainty). My favorite line in this spiraling excerpt, "...it is one thing to speak, and another to know," takes me back to the final lines in Wendell Berry's poem, "How to Be a Poet," which he wrote primarily as a reminder to himself: Accept what comes from silence. Make the best you can of it. Of the little words that come out of the silence, like prayers prayed back to the one who prays, make a poem that does not disturb the silence from which it came. Wherever your preferences fall on the cataphatic or apophatic spectrum of theology (whether you lean more toward what we can say about God or what we cannot), Berry's poem, I think, would nod along with St. John: before we say too much, let our words be preserved by the silence from which they came. I'm thinking of the silence, that filling, restorative quiet I feel when I step into a cathedral or in some of my favorite moments with my kids in the early hours. Even before praying, can we hear the One already praying in us? ​​​​​​​Let's start there. LUKE TAYLOR GILSTRAP is Vice President of the Board of Directors for Eighth Day Institute. His poems have appeared in Spiritus, Ekstasis (Christianity Today), and Relief Journal, among others. He lives happily in Wichita, Kansas with his wife and three sons.
By Mark C. Watney July 20, 2026
Late-Night Bookstores and Spiritual Reading
By Sarah Orner July 20, 2026
On St. Benedict and the Making of Vows
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
The Pursuit of Truth in the Age of AI
By Michael Simmon July 20, 2026
On the Theology of Raising Chickens
By Luke Taylor Gilstrap July 20, 2026
G.K. Chesterton and Raising Small Children
By Fr. Mark Lovett June 9, 2026
"Seal of the Fathers"
More Posts